On October 11, 2019, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in the matter of Pa. AFLCIO v. Commonwealth No. 62 M:D. 2019 dismissed a challenge to Act 111 with the Court concluding that Pennsylvania's adoption of the AMA Sixth Edition Second Printing was a proper delegation of legislative authority.
Read More The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in their Decision in Hartford v. Kamara No. 24 EAP 2017 decided November 21, 2018 has further limited Employer’s right to initiate suit against a third party on behalf of a Claimant.
Read More The PDF outlines the effective techniques for mediating a workers' compensation claim from all the parties' perspectives.
Read More The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act provides that Employers who establish a list of designated Health Care Providers and obtain signed notification forms may control medical treatment for the first ninety (90) days from the date of the first “visit” for the treatment of the work injury or illness. The exception remains emergency care. Again, the Employer need not pay for medical care during the ninety (90) day treatment period of the Employee obtains care from other Health Care Providers.
Read More A Quick Reference Guide that covers Pennsylvania Workers Compensation.
Read More In the matter of Patricia Righter v. WCAB (Righter Parking), 1356 C.D. 2015, filed
June 14, 2016, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court addressed the issue of whether the WCJ
erred in that case in concluding that Claimant’s counsel’s 20% fee agreement with their client
did not entitle Claimant’s counsel to a 20% of medical bills paid in conjunction with the awarded Claim Petition.
Read More June 14, 2016, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court addressed the issue of whether the WCJ
erred in that case in concluding that Claimant’s counsel’s 20% fee agreement with their client
did not entitle Claimant’s counsel to a 20% of medical bills paid in conjunction with the awarded Claim Petition.
A compendium of Common Orthopedic Injuries including their diagnosis and treatment.
Read More Section 306 of the WC Act provides that disputes as to reasonableness and necessity are to be
resolved via the Utilization Review (UR) Process set forth in that provision of the statute. There is no other way to contest the reasonableness and necessity of treatment in a PA WC claim.
Read More resolved via the Utilization Review (UR) Process set forth in that provision of the statute. There is no other way to contest the reasonableness and necessity of treatment in a PA WC claim.
The Pennsylvania House Labor and Industry Committee is considering House Bill No. 1800.The bill proposes establishing a set of standards for medical care for injured workers, which in a utilization review setting, would establish a more precise measure for whether care in question is reasonable and necessary.
Read More